Papua New Guinea vs Uganda: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Papua New Guinea
500 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uganda
49.81 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Uganda rank
4th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Uganda
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 500 DB16-20 methodology against 49.81 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda, a difference of 450.19 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 10.0 times Uganda's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 4th of 125 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Papua New Guinea or Uganda?
- Papua New Guinea, at 500 DB16-20 methodology against 49.81 DB16-20 methodology in Uganda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 450.19 DB16-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Uganda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Uganda rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 4th of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.