Portugal vs Slovak Republic: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Portugal
0.61 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Slovak Republic
0.68 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Portugal rank
85th
Slovak Republic rank
83rd
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Portugal
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Slovak Republic currently reports 0.68 DB16-20 methodology against 0.61 DB16-20 methodology in Portugal, a difference of 0.07 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Slovak Republic's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Portugal ranks 85th and Slovak Republic ranks 83rd of 125 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Portugal or Slovak Republic?
- Slovak Republic, at 0.68 DB16-20 methodology against 0.61 DB16-20 methodology in Portugal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Portugal and Slovak Republic?
- 0.07 DB16-20 methodology, with Slovak Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Slovak Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Portugal and Slovak Republic rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Portugal ranks 85th and Slovak Republic ranks 83rd of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.