Romania vs Serbia: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF
Romania
3.35 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Serbia
3.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Romania rank
43rd
Serbia rank
46th
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIF over time
- Romania
- Serbia
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3.35 DB16-20 methodology against 3.11 DB16-20 methodology in Serbia, a difference of 0.24 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Romania ahead.
Romania ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif, Romania or Serbia?
- Romania, at 3.35 DB16-20 methodology against 3.11 DB16-20 methodology in Serbia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif between Romania and Serbia?
- 0.24 DB16-20 methodology, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Serbia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Romania and Serbia rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index (saif?
- Romania ranks 43rd and Serbia ranks 46th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.