Singapore vs Uzbekistan: Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index
Singapore
0.11 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Uzbekistan
0.08 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Singapore rank
120th
Uzbekistan rank
121st
Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index over time
- Singapore
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.11 DB16-20 methodology against 0.08 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.03 DB16-20 methodology.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Singapore ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 121st of 125 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index, Singapore or Uzbekistan?
- Singapore, at 0.11 DB16-20 methodology against 0.08 DB16-20 methodology in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index between Singapore and Uzbekistan?
- 0.03 DB16-20 methodology, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and Uzbekistan rank globally for getting electricity: system average interruption frequency index?
- Singapore ranks 120th and Uzbekistan ranks 121st of 125 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Getting electricity: System average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The system average interruption frequency index (SAIFI) is the average number of service interruptions experienced by a customer in a year. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.