Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Global: Ease of doing business score
Global: Ease of doing business score over time
- Eswatini
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 59.04 DB10-14 methodology against 58.69 DB10-14 methodology in Eswatini, a difference of 0.35 DB10-14 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 117th and Solomon Islands ranks 114th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.23 DB10-14 methodology | 51.66 DB10-14 methodology | 1.57 DB10-14 methodology | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 57.9 DB10-14 methodology | 58.21 DB10-14 methodology | 0.307 DB10-14 methodology | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher global: ease of doing business score, Eswatini or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 59.04 DB10-14 methodology against 58.69 DB10-14 methodology in Eswatini as of 2013.
- What is the difference in global: ease of doing business score between Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
- 0.35 DB10-14 methodology, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Solomon Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2013.
- How do Eswatini and Solomon Islands rank globally for global: ease of doing business score?
- Eswatini ranks 117th and Solomon Islands ranks 114th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.