Global: Ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of

Eswatini, Kingdom of: Global: Ease of doing business score was 58.69 DB10-14 methodology in 2013. β–² Rising

Latest (2013)
58.69 DB10-14 methodology
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
116th
of 183 countries
All-time high
58.69 DB10-14 methodology
in 2013
All-time low
53.23 DB10-14 methodology
in 2009
Years of data
5
2009–2013

Global: Ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of, 2009–2013

02040602009201120132009: 53.2 DB10-14 methodology2010: 57.2 DB10-14 methodology2011: 57.5 DB10-14 methodology2012: 58.2 DB10-14 methodology2013: 58.7 DB10-14 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB10-14 methodology.

Analysis

In 2013, global: ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of stood at 58.69 DB10-14 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 0.8% on the previous year and up 10.3% over five years.

Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 116th of 183 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 53.23 DB10-14 methodology 53.23 DB10-14 methodology 53.23 DB10-14 methodology 1
2010s 57.9 DB10-14 methodology 57.19 DB10-14 methodology 58.69 DB10-14 methodology 4

Countries ranked near Eswatini, Kingdom of

  1. 113 Solomon Islands 59.04 DB10-14 methodology compare
  2. 114 Cabo Verde 58.96 DB10-14 methodology compare
  3. 115 Honduras 58.9 DB10-14 methodology compare
  4. 117 Palau, Republic of 58.53 DB10-14 methodology compare
  5. 118 Papua New Guinea 58.24 DB10-14 methodology compare
  6. 119 Nicaragua 57.98 DB10-14 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 183 places β†’

More private sector data for Eswatini, Kingdom of

All data for Eswatini, Kingdom of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is global: ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of?
Global: ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of was 58.69 DB10-14 methodology in 2013, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest global: ease of doing business score recorded in Eswatini, Kingdom of?
The highest recorded value was 58.69 DB10-14 methodology in 2013.
What is the lowest global: ease of doing business score recorded in Eswatini, Kingdom of?
The lowest recorded value was 53.23 DB10-14 methodology in 2009.
How does Eswatini, Kingdom of rank for global: ease of doing business score?
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 116th out of 183 countries with data for 2013.
Where does this Eswatini, Kingdom of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Global: Ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/global-ease-of-doing-business-score-db10-14-methodology/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/global-ease-of-doing-business-score-db10-14-methodology/eswatini/">Global: Ease of doing business score in Eswatini, Kingdom of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Global: Ease of doing business score (DB10-14 methodology)
Unit
DB10-14 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 915 data points, 2009–2013
Last refreshed

The ease of doing business score is the simple average of the scores for each of the Doing Business topics: starting a business, dealing with construction permits, getting electricity, registering property, getting credit, protecting minority investors, paying taxes, trading across borders, enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB10-14 studies for topics that underwent methodology updates.