Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nepal: Logistics performance: Competence and quality

Democratic Republic of Congo
2.4 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Nepal
2.46 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
118th
Nepal rank
117th

Logistics performance: Competence and quality over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Nepal
0123200720142022

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 2.46 1=low to 5=high against 2.4 1=low to 5=high in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.06 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Nepal ranks 117th of 156 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics, Democratic Republic of Congo or Nepal?
Nepal, at 2.46 1=low to 5=high against 2.4 1=low to 5=high in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics between Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
0.06 1=low to 5=high, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal rank globally for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 118th and Nepal ranks 117th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nepal: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/congo-dem-rep/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/congo-dem-rep/nepal/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nepal: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.