Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Nepal

Nepal: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics was 2.46 1=low to 5=high in 2018. ▲ Rising

Latest (2018)
2.46 1=low to 5=high
Change on year
up 15.3%
World rank
117th
of 156 countries
All-time high
2.5 1=low to 5=high
in 2014
All-time low
2.07 1=low to 5=high
in 2010
Years of data
6
2007–2018

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Nepal, 2007–2018

00.511.522.52007201220182007: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2010: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2012: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2014: 2.5 1=low to 5=high2016: 2.1 1=low to 5=high2018: 2.5 1=low to 5=high

Source: Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Measured in 1=low to 5=high.

Analysis

In 2018, logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Nepal stood at 2.46 1=low to 5=high.

The figure is up 15.3% on the previous year and up 18.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Nepal peaked at 2.5 1=low to 5=high in 2014 and was at its lowest, 2.07 1=low to 5=high, in 2010.

Nepal ranks 117th of 156 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Nepal, year by year

Annual values for Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high) in Nepal, 2007 to 2018.
Year 1=low to 5=high Change
2007 2.08 1=low to 5=high
2010 2.07 1=low to 5=high -0.5%
2012 2.12 1=low to 5=high +2.4%
2014 2.5 1=low to 5=high +17.9%
2016 2.13 1=low to 5=high -14.7%
2018 2.46 1=low to 5=high +15.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2.08 1=low to 5=high 2.08 1=low to 5=high 2.08 1=low to 5=high 1
2010s 2.26 1=low to 5=high 2.07 1=low to 5=high 2.5 1=low to 5=high 5

Countries ranked near Nepal

  1. 115 Zambia 2.48 1=low to 5=high compare
  2. 116 Lebanon 2.47 1=low to 5=high compare
  3. 118 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  4. 118 Burkina Faso 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  5. 118 Cambodia 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  6. 118 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  7. 118 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  8. 118 Liberia 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  9. 118 Sudan 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare
  10. 118 Togo 2.4 1=low to 5=high compare

See the full ranking of 203 places →

More private sector data for Nepal

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Nepal?
Logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics in Nepal was 2.46 1=low to 5=high in 2018, according to Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB).
What is the highest logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics recorded in Nepal?
The highest recorded value was 2.5 1=low to 5=high in 2014.
What is the lowest logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics recorded in Nepal?
The lowest recorded value was 2.07 1=low to 5=high in 2010.
How does Nepal rank for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics?
Nepal ranks 117th out of 156 countries with data for 2018.
Is logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics rising or falling in Nepal?
Over the last ten years it is up 18.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Nepal data come from?
The figures come from Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as part of Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Nepal. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/nepal/">Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics in Nepal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.