East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe &

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2.7%
in 2023
Lithuania
13.6%
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
25th
Lithuania rank
22nd

Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Lithuania
0510152025196319932023

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 13.6% against 2.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 10.9%.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 5.0 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Lithuania ranks 22nd of 47 groups.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4% 17.6% 17.2% Lithuania
2000s 1.2% 9.3% 8.1% Lithuania
2010s 1.8% 11.5% 9.7% Lithuania
2020s 2.1% 11.6% 9.5% Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in europe &, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Lithuania?
Lithuania, at 13.6% against 2.7% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in europe & between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lithuania?
10.9%, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lithuania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Lithuania rank globally for merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in europe &?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Lithuania ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise exports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe &. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-to-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-europe-and-central-asia-percent/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/merchandise-exports-to-low-and-middle-income-economies-in-europe-and-central-asia-percent/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/lithuania/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Lithuania: Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe &</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise exports)
Unit
% of total merchandise exports
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
251 places, 10,312 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe and Central Asia are the sum of merchandise exports from the reporting economy to low- and middle-income economies in the Europe and Central Asia region according to World Bank classification of economies. Data are as a percentage of total merchandise exports by the economy. Data are computed only if at least half of the economies in the partner country group had non-missing data.