Cape Verde vs Eswatini: Protecting investors, director liability index
Protecting investors, director liability index over time
- Cape Verde
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 5 against 5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 16th of 51 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5 | 1 | 4 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 5 | 5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting investors, director liability index, Cape Verde or Eswatini?
- Cape Verde, at 5 against 5 in Eswatini as of 2012.
- What is the difference in protecting investors, director liability index between Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Eswatini?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2012.
- How do Cape Verde and Eswatini rank globally for protecting investors, director liability index?
- Cape Verde ranks 16th and Eswatini ranks 16th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/), published as Protecting investors, director liability index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Director liability index measures a plaintiff’s ability to hold directors of firms liable for damages to the company, that is, measures the strength of minority shareholder protections against directors’ misuse of corporate assets for personal gain. The indicators distinguish 3 dimensions of investor protection: transparency of transactions (extent of disclosure index), liability for self-dealing (extent of director liability index) and shareholders’ ability to sue officers and directors for misconduct (ease of shareholder suits index). The data come from a survey of corporate lawyers and are based on company laws, court rules of evidence and securities regulations. For more information, visit http://www.doingbusiness.org/MethodologySurveys/.