Guinea-Bissau vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
63.9%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
65.5%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
108th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
105th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 65.5% against 63.9% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.1% | 70.5% | 47.3% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 68.9% | 22.9% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 65.5% against 63.9% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.6%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.