Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 63.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Guinea-Bissau stood at 63.9%. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 125.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Guinea-Bissau peaked at 63.9% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 21.2%, in 2005.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Guinea-Bissau, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 21.2% | — |
| 2006 | 21.9% | +3.6% |
| 2007 | 22.2% | +1.1% |
| 2008 | 22.1% | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 28.3% | +28.3% |
| 2010 | 28.3% | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 28.5% | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 29.1% | +2.2% |
| 2013 | 28.9% | -0.9% |
| 2014 | 28.5% | -1.4% |
| 2015 | 62.7% | +120.3% |
| 2016 | 63.2% | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 63.5% | +0.4% |
| 2018 | 63.8% | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 63.9% | +0.1% |
Guinea-Bissau compared with similar countries
- Guinea-Bissau's 63.9% is above the median for low income countries, which is 49.4%, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Guinea-Bissau's 63.9% is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 51.2%, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Guinea-Bissau changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +120.3% | 28.5% | 62.7% |
| 2009 | +28.3% | 22.1% | 28.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.1% | 21.2% | 28.3% | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.0% | 28.3% | 63.9% | 10 |
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
More private sector data for Guinea-Bissau
- Merchandise trade 31.7% (2025)
- Food imports 41.7% (2018)
- Manufactures imports 38.6% (2018)
- Merchandise imports 489.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 198.43 million current US$ (2024)
- Food exports 68.5% (2018)
- Manufactures exports 0.0% (2015)
- Merchandise exports 313.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 48.77 million current US$ (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 139.14 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Guinea-Bissau?
- Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Guinea-Bissau was 63.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was 63.9% in 2019.
- What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.2% in 2005.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 108th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Guinea-Bissau?
- Over the last ten years it is up 125.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.