Sudan vs United States of America: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Sudan
82.9%
in 2019
United States of America
84.1%
in 2019
Sudan rank
48th
United States of America rank
46th
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score over time
- Sudan
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 84.1% against 82.9% in Sudan, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United States of America ahead.
Sudan ranks 48th and United States of America ranks 46th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.3% | 96.9% | 18.6% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 81.8% | 85.7% | 3.8% | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: cost (% of property value) - score, Sudan or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 84.1% against 82.9% in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: cost (% of property value) - score between Sudan and United States of America?
- 1.2%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and United States of America?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Sudan and United States of America rank globally for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
- Sudan ranks 48th and United States of America ranks 46th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.