Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan

Sudan: Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score was 82.9% in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
82.9%
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
48th
of 191 countries
All-time high
82.9%
in 2019
All-time low
76.5%
in 2004
Years of data
16
2004–2019

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan, 2004–2019

0204060802004201120192004: 76.52005: 77.42006: 78.32007: 78.42008: 79.32009: 79.82010: 802011: 80.32012: 81.52013: 81.52014: 81.72015: 82.42016: 82.52017: 82.62018: 82.82019: 82.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Sudan recorded 82.9% for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 16 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 3.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Sudan peaked at 82.9% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 76.5%, in 2004.

That places Sudan 48th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 16 years of available data.

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan, 2004 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2004 76.5%
2005 77.4% +1.2%
2006 78.3% +1.1%
2007 78.4% +0.1%
2008 79.3% +1.2%
2009 79.8% +0.6%
2010 80.0% +0.3%
2011 80.3% +0.3%
2012 81.5% +1.5%
2013 81.5% -0.0%
2014 81.7% +0.2%
2015 82.4% +0.9%
2016 82.5% +0.2%
2017 82.6% +0.1%
2018 82.8% +0.2%
2019 82.9% +0.1%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 78.3% 76.5% 79.8% 6
2010s 81.8% 80.0% 82.9% 10

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 45 Panama 84.3% compare
  2. 46 United States 84.1% compare
  3. 47 Norway 83.3% compare
  4. 49 Venezuela 82.6% compare
  5. 50 Serbia 82.4% compare
  6. 51 Angola 81.9% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Sudan?
Registering property: cost (% of property value) - score in Sudan was 82.9% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 82.9% in 2019.
What is the lowest registering property: cost (% of property value) - score recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 76.5% in 2004.
How does Sudan rank for registering property: cost (% of property value) - score?
Sudan ranks 48th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is registering property: cost (% of property value) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 16 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-cost-percent-of-property-value-score/sudan/">Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Cost (% of property value) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 2,949 data points, 2004–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.