Canada vs Latvia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Canada
81.88
in 2014
Latvia
81.77
in 2014
Canada rank
27th
Latvia rank
29th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Canada
  • Latvia
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Canada currently reports 81.88 against 81.77 in Latvia, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 29th of 181 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 84.61 67.45 17.16 Canada
2010s 82.89 80.44 2.45 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Canada or Latvia?
Canada, at 81.88 against 81.77 in Latvia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Canada and Latvia?
0.11, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Latvia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Canada and Latvia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Canada ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.