Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score was 81.77 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
81.77
Change on year
down 0.0%
World rank
29th
of 184 countries
All-time high
81.77
in 2013
All-time low
61.83
in 2004
Years of data
11
2004–2014

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2004–2014

0204060802004200920142004: 61.82005: 61.92006: 67.62007: 67.62008: 71.12009: 74.72010: 75.22011: 81.82012: 81.82013: 81.82014: 81.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Latvia stood at 81.77.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 32.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Latvia peaked at 81.77 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 61.83, in 2004.

Latvia ranks 29th of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2004 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2004 61.83 —
2005 61.85 +0.0%
2006 67.62 +9.3%
2007 67.59 -0.0%
2008 71.1 +5.2%
2009 74.69 +5.0%
2010 75.16 +0.6%
2011 81.75 +8.8%
2012 81.76 +0.0%
2013 81.77 +0.0%
2014 81.77 -0.0%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 81.77 is above the median for high income countries, which is 78.04, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 81.77 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 78.2, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.45 61.83 74.69 6
2010s 80.44 75.16 81.77 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 26 Mongolia 82.76 compare
  2. 27 Canada 81.88 compare
  3. 28 Oman 81.77 compare
  4. 30 Austria 81.07 compare
  5. 31 Romania 80.98 compare
  6. 32 Kosovo 80.53 compare
  7. 32 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 80.53 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More private sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Latvia?
Registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Latvia was 81.77 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 81.77 in 2013.
What is the lowest registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 61.83 in 2004.
How does Latvia rank for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 29th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 32.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-db05-15-methodology-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-db05-15-methodology-score/latvia/">Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,974 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.