Latvia vs Mongolia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Latvia
81.77
in 2014
Mongolia
82.76
in 2014
Latvia rank
29th
Mongolia rank
26th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Mongolia
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 82.76 against 81.77 in Latvia, a difference of 0.99.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 181 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 67.45 82.37 14.93 Mongolia
2010s 80.44 82.66 2.22 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Latvia or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 82.76 against 81.77 in Latvia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Latvia and Mongolia?
0.99, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 29th and Mongolia ranks 26th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.