Latvia vs Poland: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Latvia
81.77
in 2014
Poland
80.3
in 2014
Latvia rank
29th
Poland rank
32nd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Poland
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 81.77 against 80.3 in Poland, a difference of 1.47.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 29th and Poland ranks 32nd of 181 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 67.45 52.63 14.82 Latvia
2010s 80.44 72.14 8.3 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Latvia or Poland?
Latvia, at 81.77 against 80.3 in Poland as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Latvia and Poland?
1.47, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Poland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Latvia and Poland rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 29th and Poland ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.