Latvia vs Romania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Latvia
81.77
in 2014
Romania
80.98
in 2014
Latvia rank
29th
Romania rank
31st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Latvia
  • Romania
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 81.77 against 80.98 in Romania, a difference of 0.79.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Romania ahead.

Latvia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 67.45 71.95 4.51 Romania
2010s 80.44 80.73 0.2879 Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Latvia or Romania?
Latvia, at 81.77 against 80.98 in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Latvia and Romania?
0.79, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 29th and Romania ranks 31st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.