Samoa vs Sudan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Samoa
78.38
in 2014
Sudan
78.4
in 2014
Samoa rank
43rd
Sudan rank
41st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Samoa
  • Sudan
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 78.4 against 78.38 in Samoa, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sudan ahead.

Samoa ranks 43rd and Sudan ranks 41st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 61.65 77.28 15.63 Sudan
2010s 80.8 78.18 2.63 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Samoa or Sudan?
Sudan, at 78.4 against 78.38 in Samoa as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Samoa and Sudan?
0.02, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sudan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Samoa and Sudan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Samoa ranks 43rd and Sudan ranks 41st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.