Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan

Sudan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score was 78.4 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
78.4
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
43rd
of 184 countries
All-time high
78.4
in 2014
All-time low
76.69
in 2004
Years of data
11
2004–2014

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2004–2014

0204060802004200920142004: 76.72005: 772006: 77.32007: 77.32008: 77.62009: 77.82010: 77.92011: 77.92012: 78.32013: 78.32014: 78.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Sudan stood at 78.4. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 2.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Sudan peaked at 78.4 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 76.69, in 2004.

That places Sudan 43rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top quarter.

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, year by year

Annual values for Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan, 2004 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2004 76.69 —
2005 76.98 +0.4%
2006 77.28 +0.4%
2007 77.31 +0.0%
2008 77.63 +0.4%
2009 77.78 +0.2%
2010 77.86 +0.1%
2011 77.94 +0.1%
2012 78.35 +0.5%
2013 78.34 -0.0%
2014 78.4 +0.1%

Sudan compared with similar countries

  • Sudan's 78.4 is above the median for low income countries, which is 57.24, 1.4× the median. (22 countries reporting)
  • Sudan's 78.4 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 58.16, 1.3× the median. (46 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 77.28 76.69 77.78 6
2010s 78.18 77.86 78.4 5

Countries ranked near Sudan

  1. 40 Yemen 79.17 compare
  2. 41 Botswana 78.6 compare
  3. 42 Vietnam 78.58 compare
  4. 44 Costa Rica 78.4 compare
  5. 45 Samoa 78.38 compare
  6. 46 Burundi 78.38 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More private sector data for Sudan

All data for Sudan →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Sudan?
Registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score in Sudan was 78.4 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The highest recorded value was 78.4 in 2014.
What is the lowest registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score recorded in Sudan?
The lowest recorded value was 76.69 in 2004.
How does Sudan rank for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Sudan ranks 43rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sudan?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sudan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-db05-15-methodology-score/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-db05-15-methodology-score/sudan/">Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score in Sudan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,974 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.