Sudan vs Vietnam: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Sudan
78.4
in 2014
Vietnam
78.58
in 2014
Sudan rank
41st
Vietnam rank
40th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Sudan
  • Vietnam
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Vietnam currently reports 78.58 against 78.4 in Sudan, a difference of 0.18.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 41st and Vietnam ranks 40th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sudan Vietnam Difference Ahead
2000s 77.28 76.15 1.12 Sudan
2010s 78.18 78.56 0.3775 Vietnam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Sudan or Vietnam?
Vietnam, at 78.58 against 78.4 in Sudan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Sudan and Vietnam?
0.18, with Vietnam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Vietnam?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Sudan and Vietnam rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Sudan ranks 41st and Vietnam ranks 40th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.