Austria vs China: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- China
How they compare
China currently reports 80.99 against 79.98 in Austria, a difference of 1.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 31st and China ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Austria or China?
- China, at 80.99 against 79.98 in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Austria and China?
- 1.01, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Austria and China rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 31st and China ranks 28th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.