Brunei Darussalam vs Grenada: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Brunei Darussalam
50.65
in 2019
Grenada
50.14
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
142nd
Grenada rank
145th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Grenada
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Brunei Darussalam currently reports 50.65 against 50.14 in Grenada, a difference of 0.51.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Grenada ahead.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 142nd and Grenada ranks 145th of 188 countries.

Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Grenada?
Brunei Darussalam, at 50.65 against 50.14 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Grenada?
0.51, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Grenada?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Brunei Darussalam and Grenada rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 142nd and Grenada ranks 145th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.