Cape Verde vs Thailand: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cape Verde
68.81
in 2019
Thailand
69.55
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
68th
Thailand rank
66th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Thailand
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 69.55 against 68.81 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.74.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Cape Verde ranks 68th and Thailand ranks 66th of 188 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cape Verde or Thailand?
Thailand, at 69.55 against 68.81 in Cape Verde as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cape Verde and Thailand?
0.74, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Thailand?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Thailand rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 68th and Thailand ranks 66th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.