Central African Republic vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 43.12 against 41.97 in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.15.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 171st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 169th of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Central African Republic or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 43.12 against 41.97 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Central African Republic and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 1.15, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 171st and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 169th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.