China vs Hungary: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Hungary
How they compare
China currently reports 80.99 against 80.09 in Hungary, a difference of 0.9.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hungary ahead.
China ranks 28th and Hungary ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Hungary?
- China, at 80.99 against 80.09 in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Hungary?
- 0.9, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hungary?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Hungary rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 28th and Hungary ranks 29th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.