China vs Italy: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

China
80.99
in 2019
Italy
81.75
in 2019
China rank
28th
Italy rank
26th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Italy
020406080201520172019

How they compare

Italy currently reports 81.75 against 80.99 in China, a difference of 0.76.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

China ranks 28th and Italy ranks 26th of 188 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Italy?
Italy, at 81.75 against 80.99 in China as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Italy?
0.76, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Italy?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do China and Italy rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
China ranks 28th and Italy ranks 26th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.