China vs Latvia: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
China
80.99
in 2019
Latvia
82.29
in 2019
China rank
28th
Latvia rank
25th
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 82.29 against 80.99 in China, a difference of 1.3.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 82.29 against 80.99 in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between China and Latvia?
- 1.3, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 28th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.