Democratic Republic of Congo vs Suriname: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 46.78 against 46.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 46.78 against 46.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?
- 0.16, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Suriname rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.