Democratic Republic of Congo vs Syria: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Democratic Republic of Congo
46.62
in 2019
Syria
45.21
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
157th
Syria rank
160th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Syria
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 46.62 against 45.21 in Syria, a difference of 1.41.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Syria ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Syria ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Syria?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 46.62 against 45.21 in Syria as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Syria?
1.41, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Syria?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Syria rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 157th and Syria ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.