Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Trinidad and Tobago: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 46.66 against 46.62 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 160th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 159th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 46.66 against 46.62 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.04, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 160th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.