Croatia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Croatia
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 77.41 against 75.74 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 1.67.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Croatia ranks 38th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 41st of 190 countries.
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Croatia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Croatia, at 77.41 against 75.74 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Croatia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 1.67, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Croatia ranks 38th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 41st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.