Cyprus vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
67.91
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
68.06
in 2019
Cyprus rank
70th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
69th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 68.06 against 67.91 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.

Cyprus ranks 70th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 69th of 188 countries.

Iran, Islamic Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 68.06 against 67.91 in Cyprus as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0.15, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Cyprus and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 70th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 69th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.