Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
44.45
in 2019
Nicaragua
46.35
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
161st
Nicaragua rank
158th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Nicaragua
01020304050201520172019

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 46.35 against 44.45 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.9.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Nicaragua ranks 158th of 188 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 46.35 against 44.45 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
1.9, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Nicaragua ranks 158th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.