Eswatini vs Honduras: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Eswatini
60.8
in 2019
Honduras
62.27
in 2019
Eswatini rank
103rd
Honduras rank
100th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Honduras
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 62.27 against 60.8 in Eswatini, a difference of 1.47.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 103rd and Honduras ranks 100th of 188 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Honduras?
Honduras, at 62.27 against 60.8 in Eswatini as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Honduras?
1.47, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Honduras?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Eswatini and Honduras rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Eswatini ranks 103rd and Honduras ranks 100th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.