Finland vs Malaysia: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 79.53 against 78.99 in Finland, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Finland or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 79.53 against 78.99 in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Finland and Malaysia?
- 0.54, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Malaysia rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 34th and Malaysia ranks 33rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.