Georgia vs New Zealand: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Georgia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 94.59 against 92.86 in Georgia, a difference of 1.73.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Georgia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 94.59 against 92.86 in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Georgia and New Zealand?
- 1.73, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and New Zealand rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Georgia ranks 5th and New Zealand ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.