Hong Kong, China vs Oman: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Oman
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 73.56 against 73.03 in Oman, a difference of 0.53.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Oman ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Oman ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or Oman?
- Hong Kong, China, at 73.56 against 73.03 in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and Oman?
- 0.53, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Oman rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 51st and Oman ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.