Hong Kong vs Slovenia: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 73.56 against 72.11 in Slovenia, a difference of 1.45.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Slovenia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 55th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or Slovenia?
- Hong Kong, at 73.56 against 72.11 in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 1.45, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Slovenia rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 55th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.