Japan vs Romania: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Japan
75.6
in 2019
Romania
75.03
in 2019
Japan rank
42nd
Romania rank
45th
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Romania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 75.6 against 75.03 in Romania, a difference of 0.57.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Japan or Romania?
- Japan, at 75.6 against 75.03 in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Japan and Romania?
- 0.57, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Romania rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 42nd and Romania ranks 45th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.