Luxembourg vs Malawi: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Luxembourg
63.86
in 2019
Malawi
64.92
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
92nd
Malawi rank
89th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Malawi
0204060201520172019

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 64.92 against 63.86 in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.06.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 89th of 188 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Luxembourg or Malawi?
Malawi, at 64.92 against 63.86 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Luxembourg and Malawi?
1.06, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Luxembourg ranks 92nd and Malawi ranks 89th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.