Malaysia vs Netherlands: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 80.06 against 79.53 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.53.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 33rd and Netherlands ranks 30th of 188 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 80.06 against 79.53 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 0.53, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Netherlands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Netherlands rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 33rd and Netherlands ranks 30th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.