Mongolia vs North Macedonia: Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
74.16
in 2019
North Macedonia
74.52
in 2019
Mongolia rank
49th
North Macedonia rank
47th

Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • North Macedonia
020406080201520172019

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 74.52 against 74.16 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.36.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 49th and North Macedonia ranks 47th of 188 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score, Mongolia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 74.52 against 74.16 in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score between Mongolia and North Macedonia?
0.36, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and North Macedonia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and North Macedonia rank globally for registering property (db17-20 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 49th and North Macedonia ranks 47th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.