Armenia vs Oman: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8)
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) over time
- Armenia
- Oman
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Oman, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 44th and Oman ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8), Armenia or Oman?
- Armenia, at 4 DB16-20 methodology against 4 DB16-20 methodology in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) between Armenia and Oman?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Oman rank globally for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Armenia ranks 44th and Oman ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.