Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Armenia
Armenia: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Armenia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Armenia recorded 4 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
Armenia ranks 43rd of 184 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Countries ranked near Armenia
- 43 China 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United States 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Russia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Antigua and Barbuda 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Australia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Azerbaijan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bahrain 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Belarus 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Botswana 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Brunei 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bulgaria 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Chile 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Costa Rica 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Eswatini 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Gambia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Iran 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Iraq 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Ireland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Israel 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Laos 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Latvia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Lebanon 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Malawi 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Maldives 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Mauritius 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Moldova 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Montenegro 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Norway 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Oman 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Philippines 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Poland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Portugal 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Serbia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Seychelles 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Solomon Islands 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Thailand 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United Arab Emirates 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United Kingdom 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Uzbekistan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Vanuatu 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Palestine 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Armenia
- Merchandise trade 73.3% (2025)
- Food imports 8.4% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 43.4% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 13.04 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 9.4% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 29.5% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 8.39 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 6.09 billion current US$ (2025)
- Transport services 28.5% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 11.5% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Armenia?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Armenia was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Armenia?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Armenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Armenia rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Armenia ranks 43rd out of 184 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Armenia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.