Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Gambia: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
30
in 2019
Gambia
31.67
in 2019
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
132nd
Gambia rank
130th
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 31.67 against 30 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.67.
That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 132nd and Gambia ranks 130th of 191 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 31.67 against 30 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Gambia?
- 1.67, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Gambia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Gambia rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 132nd and Gambia ranks 130th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the quality of land administration index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.