Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo

Democratic Republic of Congo: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 30 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
30
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
132nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
30
in 2015
All-time low
30
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015–2019

01020302015201720192015: 302016: 302017: 302018: 302019: 30

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 30. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.

That places Democratic Republic of Congo 132nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2015 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2015 30
2016 30 +0.0%
2017 30 +0.0%
2018 30 +0.0%
2019 30 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo

  1. 129 Pakistan 32.67 compare
  2. 130 Gambia 31.67 compare
  3. 130 Togo 31.67 compare
  4. 132 Benin 30 compare
  5. 132 Egypt 30 compare
  6. 132 Kiribati 30 compare
  7. 132 Saint Kitts and Nevis 30 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Democratic Republic of Congo

All data for Democratic Republic of Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo was 30 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The highest recorded value was 30 in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 30 in 2015.
How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 132nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology-score/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology-score/congo-dem-rep/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Democratic Republic of Congo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the quality of land administration index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.