Central African Republic vs Congo: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30)
Central African Republic
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
183rd
Congo rank
181st
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) over time
- Central African Republic
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 183rd and Congo ranks 181st of 187 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30), Central African Republic or Congo?
- Congo, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) between Central African Republic and Congo?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
- Central African Republic ranks 183rd and Congo ranks 181st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.