Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo

Congo: Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
181st
of 187 countries
All-time high
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo, 2015–2019

012342015201720192015: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo stood at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Congo ranks 181st of 187 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo, year by year

Annual values for Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology) in Congo, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 3.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Congo

  1. 179 Equatorial Guinea 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 179 Niger 4 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 181 Liberia 3.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 183 Afghanistan 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 183 Bahamas 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 183 Central African Republic 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 183 Guinea-Bissau 3 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More private sector data for Congo

All data for Congo →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo?
Registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Congo?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30) recorded in Congo?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Congo rank for registering property: quality of land administration index (0-30)?
Congo ranks 181st out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Congo data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-quality-of-land-administration-index-0-30-db17-20-methodology/congo-rep/">Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) in Congo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Quality of land administration index (0-30) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 935 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of land administration index is the sum of the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.